"Officials" in Oakland have been blatantly lying since their first police riot against Occupy Oakland in late October.
When riot police first were sent to attack Occupy Oakland, police had the two helicopter internet live feeds shut off moments before police attacked the protesters (and in the attack, very nearly killed Iraqi Veteran Scott Olsen). They did so in order to lie about what then occurred, to blame the peaceful protesters. Here is what they said happened:
"Q. Did the Police deploy rubber bullets, flash-bag grenades?
A. No, the loud noises that were heard originated from M-80 explosives thrown at
Police by protesters. In addition, Police fired approximately four bean bag rounds
at protesters to stop them from throwing dangerous objects at the officers."
"Q. Did the Police use tear gas?
http:// www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/ groups/cityadministrator/ documents/pressrelease/ oak031911.pdf
Unfortunately, later-released video clearly shows no protester throwing anything at police, or being threatening to provoke police assault; it does show police attacking with flash-bangs and tear gas:
When people attempted to help the fallen Scott Olsen, they were again attacked with flash-bangs. In the time prior to the police attack, do you see anything being thrown at cops? Anyone getting in their faces? Police attacked people attempting to help a fallen, unmoving man. Police did not one thing to help a man in obvious trouble. Did any of them turn to their fellows and demand that they do something to help the injured man? If so, I'd love to hear about it.
Here are the nice rubber bullets:
Shamus Collins:
And here is what appeared on the internet livestream moments before police attacked:
Bradblog:
So why would anyone believe anything from the mass media or most especially, from the Oakland lie factory, regarding Occupy? Especially when the local 1% had been threatening Quan to remove the Occupation:
Recently, it has been conjectured that Scott Olsen was hit by a "less-lethal" beanbag shotgun round.
“If it was a beanbag – those are meant to hit people, and it tells me that whoever did it, did it intentionally,” said Olsen’s attorney Mark Martell.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/15/scott-olsen-lawyer_n_1349586.html?ref=occupy-wall-street
Here are Oakland police/Alameda sheriffs purposefully covering up their identification against California Code 830.10, which states that identification must be visible at all time (thanks OakFoSho Spencer for Hire for that one, and all his incredible coverage):
And this man who carried a protester on the hood of his car for 20+ feet was as far as I know never charged. The protester didn't have the right to block him from driving, but this man punched it and after dislodging the protester, nearly backed into another! Where is the justice?
When riot police first were sent to attack Occupy Oakland, police had the two helicopter internet live feeds shut off moments before police attacked the protesters (and in the attack, very nearly killed Iraqi Veteran Scott Olsen). They did so in order to lie about what then occurred, to blame the peaceful protesters. Here is what they said happened:
"Q. Did the Police deploy rubber bullets, flash-bag grenades?
A. No, the loud noises that were heard originated from M-80 explosives thrown at
Police by protesters. In addition, Police fired approximately four bean bag rounds
at protesters to stop them from throwing dangerous objects at the officers."
"Q. Did the Police use tear gas?
A. Yes, the Police used a limited amount of tear gas for a small area as a defense
against protesters who were throwing various objects at Police Officers as they
approached the area. The objects included glass bottles, rocks, pots, pans, kitchen
utensils and plates at Police Officers. In addition, the protesters sprayed a Fire
Extinguisher on Police Officers."
http://Unfortunately, later-released video clearly shows no protester throwing anything at police, or being threatening to provoke police assault; it does show police attacking with flash-bangs and tear gas:
When people attempted to help the fallen Scott Olsen, they were again attacked with flash-bangs. In the time prior to the police attack, do you see anything being thrown at cops? Anyone getting in their faces? Police attacked people attempting to help a fallen, unmoving man. Police did not one thing to help a man in obvious trouble. Did any of them turn to their fellows and demand that they do something to help the injured man? If so, I'd love to hear about it.
Here are the nice rubber bullets:
Shamus Collins:
And here is what appeared on the internet livestream moments before police attacked:
Bradblog:
"Department declines to offer evidence substantiating Chief's assertions, downgrades them to 'preliminary belief'..."
Oakland officials knew crime had dropped 19% since the camp was formed:
"When Jordan received an update that crime was actually down 19 percent in the last week of
October, he wrote an email to one of Mayor Jean Quan's advisers.
'Not sure how you want to share this good news,' he wrote. 'It may be counter to our statement that the Occupy movement is negatively impacting crime in Oakland.'"
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/emails-exchanged-between-oakland-opd-reveal-tensio/nGMkF/
Oakland officials knew crime had dropped 19% since the camp was formed:
"When Jordan received an update that crime was actually down 19 percent in the last week of
'Not sure how you want to share this good news,' he wrote. 'It may be counter to our statement that the Occupy movement is negatively impacting crime in Oakland.'"
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/emails-exchanged-between-oakland-opd-reveal-tensio/nGMkF/
So why would anyone believe anything from the mass media or most especially, from the Oakland lie factory, regarding Occupy? Especially when the local 1% had been threatening Quan to remove the Occupation:
The Oakland Metro Chamber of Commerce has been quite vocal with their mantra of 'OCCUPY OAKLAND ENCAMPMENT MUST GO! OCCUPY OAKLAND ENCAMPMENT MUST GO! OCCUPY OAKLAND ENCAMPMENT MUST GO!' as they twist the arms of elected officials and try to engender popular support for their position. Now today, the Lake Merritt/Uptown District (business) Association, claiming to be a part of the '99%', has piled on, delivering a letter to the Mayor calling for 'forceful action' to end the 'social experimentation' of Occupy Oakland."
Quan has also let slip that 18 mayors had been conference-calling about Occupy:
Oakland Mayor Jean Quan Admits 18 Cities Were Consulting on #Occupy Crackdowns
And here are two confirmed police infiltrating Occupy Oakland early on:
One of them later released a video "explaining" things, but why would you believe someone who is paid to lie to your face, to get you to trust him, who is good enough at it that he is paid to do so? Whose job is betrayal? And who chooses every day to belong to this group of proven, blatant liars, who has their best interest at heart (and also his wallets)?
Here are cops in a later raid shooting a peaceful journalist, Scott Campbell, with a rubber bullet:
Army veteran injured in Oakland clashes with police
"The veteran, identified as Kayvan Sabeghi, was the second former American serviceman during the past two weeks to be badly hurt in confrontations between anti-Wall Street protesters and police in Oakland.
'He told me he was in the hospital with a lacerated spleen and that the cops had jumped him,' Kelly said. 'They put him in jail, and he told them he was injured, and they denied him medical treatment for about 18 hours.'"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/04/us-protests-oakland-veteran-idUSTRE7A37A820111104
Hurt protester Scott Olsen was 'provoking no one'
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/27/BAD61LN3LM.DTLRecently, it has been conjectured that Scott Olsen was hit by a "less-lethal" beanbag shotgun round.
“If it was a beanbag – those are meant to hit people, and it tells me that whoever did it, did it intentionally,” said Olsen’s attorney Mark Martell.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/15/scott-olsen-lawyer_n_1349586.html?ref=occupy-wall-street
Here are Oakland police/Alameda sheriffs purposefully covering up their identification against California Code 830.10, which states that identification must be visible at all time (thanks OakFoSho Spencer for Hire for that one, and all his incredible coverage):
And this man who carried a protester on the hood of his car for 20+ feet was as far as I know never charged. The protester didn't have the right to block him from driving, but this man punched it and after dislodging the protester, nearly backed into another! Where is the justice?